Specialties:

Most Popular Reports:

Newest Reports:

Hereditary Angioedema: treatment Awareness

A Survey of Fifty Allergists

November 2007

STUDY DESCRIPTION

Topic

Hereditary Angioedema Treatments

Respondent Type

Physicians

Specialties Covered

Allergists

Region

United States Only

Methodology

Online survey, self-administered via a Panel Intelligence website

Duration: 15 minutes

Size: 50 respondents

Fielding Dates: November 9 to November 10, 2007

OBJECTIVES

Evaluate treatments in development for hereditary angioedema (HAE)

  • Determine current prevalence of HAE patients and HAE attacks in the United States
  • Identify physician awareness of treatments in development for HAE
  • Examine the factors that drive allergists to prescribe medications for HAE
  • Evaluate each treatment on a number of factors including:
  • Onset of action
  • Duration of effect
  • Ease of administration
  • Side effect profile
  • Gain insight into the scenarios in which physicians would use each HAE treatment
  • Anticipate the impact of reimbursement on uptake of the treatments

 

Companies and Products Mentioned in This Report 

Company

Ticker Symbol

Product(s)

Jerini

JI4.DE

Icatibant

Dyax

DYAX

DX-88

Pharming Grp NV

PHGUF.PK

Rhucin

Lev Pharmaceuticals

LEVP.OB

Cinryze

CSL Behring

CSL

Berinert-P

 


Key Findings

  • Responding allergists have seen a median of 3 HAE patients over past year. The average patient is 23 years of age and experiences three HAE attacks per year.
  • DX-88 Ranked Lowest in Awareness. The majority of the allergists indicate awareness of HAE is higher now than 5 years ago. Of the treatments in developments for HAE, the physicians are most aware of rC1-INH (Rhucin) and least aware of DX-88. However, overall awareness of the treatments in development is mediocre.
  • Onset of action most important attribute for HAE treatments.  Duration of effect was ranked as the second most important attribute. C1-INH (Cinryze) and C1-INH (freeze dried, Berinert-P) received the highest and second highest ratings respectively for their efficacy, duration of effect, onset of action, and side-effect profiles. Icatibant had the highest mean rating for ease of administration.
  • Rhucin rated as having the most superior product profile. 40% of the respondents indicate they believe Rhucin has the most superior profile. The rest of the respondents were evenly divided between the other four treatments. Respondents reported that Rhucin is most suited for laryngeal attacks, Berinert-P is most suited for abdominal attacks and DX-88 is most suited for cutaneous attacks.
  • Icatibant and Rhucin used most frequently in initial treatment. After viewing the treatment profiles, respondents suggest they would most frequently use Icatibant and Rhucin for the most severe cases of HAE. Selection of DX-88 for the most severe cases of HAE jumped from 10% to 26% following display of the product profiles. The discrepancy between responses prior to and following the profiles supports the data suggesting that awareness of DX-88 is very low.
  • Discrepancy between treatment ratings and anticipated use. Although the respondents gave the highest attribute ratings to Cinryze and Berinert-P, they anticipate using Rhucin most frequently and indicated it has the most superior profile. This discrepancy may be due to two factors. First, the respondents indicated they are most familiar with Rhucin which could bias them toward using it more frequently. Second, Rhucin was selected most frequently as having the superior profile after respondents were presented with the product profiles for each treatment, whereas the attribute ratings were made prior to the profiles being displayed.
  • Physicians expected reimbursement to be a challenge, but the least important prescribing factor. 44% believe reimbursement will be a substantial challenge and 52% anticipate it will be somewhat of a challenge for patients if the treatments become available in the US. The respondents indicated price has almost no bearing on their HAE treatment choice.


Inclusion Criteria and Respondent Demographics

Inclusion Criteria

 

  • Board-certified or eligible allergists
  • In practice between 2 and 30 years
  • Spends at least 75% of professional time in clinical practice
  • Treated at least 1 HAE patient in the last 12 months

 

Metric

Mean

Median

Minimum

Maximum

Standard Deviation

Years in Practice

14.1 years

13.5 years

2 years

30 years

7.4 years

% of Time in
Clinical Practice

96.4%

99.0%

75%

100%

6.0%

HAE Patients Treated in Past 12 Months

6.9 patients

3.0 patients

1 patients

100 patients

14.2 patients

 

Practice Setting

% of Respondents

Number of Responses

Academic / teaching hospital

6%

3

Community hospital

0%

0

Group practice – single specialty

38%

19

Group practice – multi-specialty

24%

12

Private practice

32%

16


quantitative survey detailed findings by question

SECTION ONE: Hereditary angioedema (hae) patient population and awareness

Question 1             

How many individual HAE patients have you seen in the past 12 months?
Please do not include multiple visits by a single patient.

HAE Patients Seen in Past 12 Months (n = 49*):

 

Mean

Median

Minimum

Maximum

Standard
Deviation

HAE Patients

6.8

3.0

1

100

14.3

Note: One respondent indicated they have seen fewer patients than they treated over the last 12 months, so their response was deleted

Question 2

Please estimate the average age at which your HAE patients are diagnosed with the disease.

Average Age of HAE Diagnosis (n = 50):

 

Mean

Median

Minimum

Maximum

Standard
Deviation

Years of Age

23.3

23.0

3

53

10.3

Question 3

How many attacks does your average HAE patient experience per year?

Average HAE Attacks per Year (n = 50):

 

Mean

Median

Minimum

Maximum

Standard
Deviation

Number of HAE Attacks

3.5

3.0

0

12

2.5

 


Question 4

In your opinion, what is the minimum number of HAE attacks that would constitute a case of severe HAE? Please select one.

(n = 50)

% of Respondents

Number of Respondents

1 HAE attack every year

8.0%

4

1 HAE attack every 6 months

22.0%

11

1 HAE attack every 3 months

28.0%

14

1 HAE attack per month

32.0%

16

2 HAE attacks per month

6.0%

3

3 HAE attacks per month

4.0%

2

4+ HAE attacks per month

0.0%

0

Question 5

How does the level of awareness of HAE now compare to 5 years ago? 

(n = 50)

% of Respondents

Number of Respondents

Substantially lower than 5 years ago

0.0%

0

Somewhat lower than 5 years ago

0.0%

0

Approximately the same as 5 years ago

46.0%

23

Somewhat higher than 5 years ago

46.0%

23

Substantially higher than 5 years ago

8.0%

4

Question 6

Have you enrolled patients in a clinical trial for HAE?

(n = 50)

% of Respondents

Number of Respondents

Yes

22.0%

11

No

78.0%

39

 


Question 7

Please indicate the HAE treatments for which you enrolled patients in a clinical trial. Please select all that apply.

(n = 11*)

% of Respondents

Number of Respondents

DX-88

36.4%

4

rC1-INH (Rhucin)

27.3%

3

C1-INH (Cinryze)

27.3%

3

Icatibant

18.2%

2

C1-INH (freeze dried, Berinert-P)

18.2%

2

Other

9.1%

1

Other HAE treatment trials mentioned: “Can’t recall… it was in 2000 and 2001”

*Only respondents who answered yes in question 6 responded to this question

 


SECTION two: hae treatment evaluation

Question 8

On a scale from 1 to 5, please indicate your level of awareness of each of the following treatments in development for HAE. 1=Not at all Aware and 5=Very Aware

Ratings of Awareness for Each Treatment (n = 50)

HAE Treatment

Mean

% Rating 1 (Not at all Aware)

% Rating 2

% Rating 3

% Rating 4

% Rating 5 (Very Aware)

rC1-INH (Rhucin) -Recombinant C1-esterase inhibitor

3.0

8.0%

30.0%

28.0%

24.0%

10.0%

C1-INH (Cinryze) - Plasma derived C1-esterase inhibitor

2.8

16.0%

28.0%

28.0%

16.0%

12.0%

C1-INH (Berinert-P) – Plasma derived C1-esterase inhibitor (freeze dried)

2.8

16.0%

28.0%

24.0%

22.0%

10.0%

Icatibant – a bradykinin B2 receptor antagonist

2.6

18.0%

36.0%

22.0%

20.0%

4.0%

DX-88 – a plasma kallikrein inhibitor

2.3

32.0%

28.0%

22.0%

10.0%

8.0%

 


Question 9

Please rank the following attributes of a HAE drug from 1 to 5 in terms of its degree of importance in choosing a particular treatment. 1=Most Important Attribute, 2=Second Most Important Attribute, and so on.

Attribute Importance Rankings (n = 50)

Attribute

Mean

% Ranking 5 (Least Important Attribute)

% Ranking 4

% Ranking 3

% Ranking 2

% Ranking 1 (Most Important Attribute)

Onset of action

1.7

4.0%

4.0%

16.0%

14.0%

62.0%

Duration of effect

2.7

4.0%

20.0%

34.0%

22.0%

20.0%

Ease of administration (Method and frequency

2.9

6.0%

28.0%

22.0%

38.0%

6.0%

Side effect profile (safety and tolerability)

3.0

4.0%

38.0%

22.0%

24.0%

12.0%

Price

4.7

82.0%

10.0%

6.0%

2.0%

0.0%

Question 10

Given what you know of the profiles of these products in development, which would you use initially in non-severe HAE patients?

(n = 50)

% of Respondents

Number of Respondents

rC1-INH (Rhucin)

36.0%

18

Icatibant

22.0%

11

C1-INH (freeze dried, Berinert-P)

18.0%

9

DX-88

12.0%

6

C1-INH (Cinryze)

12.0%

6

 


Question 11

Which of these drugs would you choose as a treatment for the most severe cases of HAE?

(n = 50)

% of Respondents

Number of Respondents

rC1-INH (Rhucin)

50.0%

25

C1-INH (freeze dried, Berinert-P)

16.0%

8

Icatibant

12.0%

6

C1-INH (Cinryze)

12.0%

6

DX-88

10.0%

5

Question 12

Would you use any of these treatments prophylactically for HAE? Please select all that apply.

(n = 50)

% of Respondents

Number of Respondents

Icatibant

42.0%

21

rC1-INH (Rhucin)

36.0%

18

DX-88

24.0%

12

C1-INH (Cinryze)

24.0%

12

C1-INH (freeze dried, Berinert-P)

24.0%

12

 


Question 13

Using a scale from 1 to 7, please rate your impression of Icatibant on each of the given attributes. 1=Very Poor Impression, 4=Neutral Impression, and 7=Very Positive Impression

Please select NA if you feel the attribute is not applicable or if your knowledge of Icatibant is too limited to respond.

Icatibant Impression Ratings (n = 41*)

Attribute

Mean

% of Respondents Rating 1-3 (Negative)

% of Respondents Rating 4

% of Respondents Rating 5-7 (Positive)

% NA

Efficacy

4.91

0.0%

28.1%

71.9%

22.0%

Side-effect profile

4.91

0.0%

34.4%

65.6%

22.0%

Onset of action

4.88

0.0%

34.4%

65.6%

22.0%

Ease of administration

4.81

3.1%

34.4%

62.5%

22.0%

Duration of effect

4.59

3.1%

43.8%

53.1%

22.0%

*Only respondents who indicated they are familiar with Icatibant in Q8 answered this question

Question 14

Using a scale from 1 to 7, please rate your impression of DX-88 on each of the given attributes. 1=Very Poor Impression, 4=Neutral Impression, and 7=Very Positive Impression

Please select NA if you feel the attribute is not applicable or if your knowledge of DX-88 is too limited to respond.

DX-88 Impression Ratings (n = 34*)

Attribute

Mean

% of Respondents Rating 1-3 (Negative)

% of Respondents Rating 4

% of Respondents Rating 5-7 (Positive)

% NA

Efficacy

4.61

3.6%

50.0%

46.4%

17.6%

Duration of effect

4.56

3.7%

48.1%

48.1%

20.6%

Onset of action

4.54

7.1%

39.3%

53.6%

17.6%

Side-effect profile

4.54

7.1%

42.9%

50.0%

17.6%

Ease of administration

4.46

14.3%

35.7%

50.0%

17.6%

*Only respondents who indicated they are familiar with DX-88 in Q8 answered this question


Question 15

Using a scale from 1 to 7, please rate your impression of rC1-INH (Rhucin) on each of the given attributes. 1=Very Poor Impression, 4=Neutral Impression, and 7=Very Positive Impression

Please select NA if you feel the attribute is not applicable or if your knowledge of rC1-INH (Rhucin) is too limited to respond.

rC1-INH (Rhucin) Impression Ratings (n = 46*)

Attribute

Mean

% of Respondents Rating 1-3 (Negative)

% of Respondents Rating 4

% of Respondents Rating 5-7 (Positive)

% NA

Efficacy

4.97

2.6%

25.6%

71.8%

15.2%

Onset of action

4.97

2.6%

35.9%

61.5%

15.2%

Duration of effect

4.85

2.6%

33.3%

64.1%

15.2%

Side-effect profile

4.85

5.1%

38.5%

56.4%

15.2%

Ease of administration

4.31

23.1%

38.5%

38.5%

15.2%

*Only respondents who indicated they are familiar with rC1-INH (Rhucin) in Q8 answered this question

Question 16

Using a scale from 1 to 7, please rate your impression of C1-INH (Cinryze) on each of the given attributes. 1=Very Poor Impression, 4=Neutral Impression, and 7=Very Positive Impression

Please select NA if you feel the attribute is not applicable or if your knowledge of C1-INH (Cinryze) is too limited to respond.

C1-INH (Cinryze) Impression Ratings (n = 42*)

Attribute

Mean

% of Respondents Rating 1-3 (Negative)

% of Respondents Rating 4

% of Respondents Rating 5-7 (Positive)

% NA

Efficacy

5.26

5.7%

14.3%

80.0%

16.7%

Duration of effect

5.24

5.9%

17.6%

76.5%

19.0%

Onset of action

5.15

5.9%

23.5%

70.6%

19.0%

Side-effect profile

5.12

5.9%

29.4%

64.7%

19.0%

Ease of administration

4.79

15.2%

24.2%

60.6%

21.4%

*Only respondents who indicated they are familiar with C1-INH (Cinryze) in Q8 answered this question


Question 17

Using a scale from 1 to 7, please rate your impression of C1-INH (freeze dried, Berinert-P) on each of the given attributes. 1=Very Poor Impression, 4=Neutral Impression, and 7=Very Positive Impression

Please select NA if you feel the attribute is not applicable or if your knowledge of C1-INH (freeze dried, Berinert-P) is too limited to respond.

C1-INH (freeze dried, Berinert-P) Impression Ratings (n = 42*)

Attribute

Mean

% of Respondents Rating 1-3 (Negative)

% of Respondents Rating 4

% of Respondents Rating 5-7 (Positive)

% NA

Efficacy

5.23

5.7%

17.1%

77.1%

16.7%

Onset of action

5.14

5.7%

20.0%

74.3%

16.7%

Side-effect profile

5.09

5.7%

20.0%

74.3%

16.7%

Duration of effect

5.03

8.6%

17.1%

74.3%

16.7%

Ease of administration

4.59

20.6%

29.4%

50.0%

19.0%

*Only respondents who indicated they are familiar with C1-INH (freeze dried, Berinert-P) in Q8 answered this question

 

SECTION three: hae treatment profiles


Question 18

Based on the information above, which treatment would you use initially in non-severe HAE patients?

(n = 50)

% of Respondents

Number of Respondents

Icatibant

32.0%

16

rC1-INH (Rhucin)

30.0%

15

DX-88

26.0%

13

C1-INH (Cinryze)

6.0%

3

C1-INH (freeze dried, Berinert-P)

6.0%

3

Question 19

Based on the information above, which of these drugs would you choose as a treatment for the most severe cases of HAE?

(n = 50)

% of Respondents

Number of Respondents

rC1-INH (Rhucin)

36.0%

18

C1-INH (freeze dried, Berinert-P)

20.0%

10

Icatibant

16.0%

8

DX-88

14.0%

7

C1-INH (Cinryze)

14.0%

7

Question 20

Based on the information above, would you use any of these treatments prophylactically for HAE? Please select all that apply.

(n = 50)

% of Respondents

Number of Respondents

Icatibant

34.0%

17

DX-88

32.0%

16

rC1-INH (Rhucin)

32.0%

16

C1-INH (freeze dried, Berinert-P)

18.0%

9

C1-INH (Cinryze)

12.0%

6

 


Question 21

Are any of the treatments listed below particularly suited to specific types of HAE attacks? Please select all of the types of attacks that apply for each treatment

 

Percentage of Respondents (Number of Responses)

(n = 50)

Laryngeal Attacks

Abdominal Attacks

Cutaneous Attacks

Icatibant

34.0% (17)

44.0% (22)

38.0% (19)

DX-88

34.0% (17)

40.0% (20)

44.0% (22)

rC1-INH (Rhucin)

52.0% (26)

46.0% (23)

40.0% (20)

C1-INH (Cinryze)

38.0% (19)

44.0% (22)

30.0% (15)

C1-INH (freeze dried, Berinert-P)

44.0% (22)

50.0% (25)

34.0% (17)

Question 22

Overall, which product do you believe has the most superior profile?

(n = 50)

% of Respondents

Number of Respondents

rC1-INH (Rhucin)

40.0%

20

DX-88

18.0%

9

Icatibant

16.0%

8

C1-INH (Cinryze)

14.0%

7

C1-INH (freeze dried, Berinert-P)

12.0%

6

Question 23

Do you anticipate reimbursement will be a challenge for patients if these therapies become available in the US?

(n = 50)

% of Respondents

Number of Respondents

Not at all a challenge

4.0%

2

Somewhat of a challenge

52.0%

26

A substantial challenge

44.0%

22

 

 

Comments on this report

There are no comments for this entry yet.

Leave a comment

 

> about us      > contact us
© Panel Intelligence, LLC. 1999-2009. All rights reserved.
A wholly owned subsidiary of MCF Corporation (NASDAQ: MERR)
Privacy Policy