HCV Discussion
April 2007
Deliverable: Transcripts
Objectives:
n Assess current practice patterns of chronic and acute hepatitis C (HCV)
n Examine ITMN-191’s strengths and weaknesses
n Gauge ITMN-191’s strengths and weaknesses in comparison to other promising agents in development:
· VX-950
· SCH 503034
· R1626
· HCV-796
n Explore the implications of drug potency, resistance, and drug toxicity on panelist enthusiasm for ITMN-191
Products Highlighted:
n VX-950, Vertex
n SCH 503034, Schering-Plough
n R1626, Roche
n HCV-796, ViroPharma/Wyeth
n Peginterferon, Roche (Pegasys®), Schering (Peg-Intron®)
n Ribavirin
Topics:
n Treatment approaches to chronic and acute HCV
n Unmet needs and treatments in development
n Reactions to and comparisons of several product profiles
n Importance of potency, drug resistance, toxicity, and stage in development
Quotes:
n “The prime need is for more…”
n “So far, … has the highest log order reduction. I think this will equate to the best efficacy in the long run. On the other … had at best a 1 log reduction, so I do not think that patients will be cured with this and I think even as add on therapy, it will not add much benefit.”
n “Combination therapy with … seems to be the most promising as there was undetectable virus in 12/12 patients after just one month of treatment and these low levels would make resistance less likely.”
n “So far the side effects appear…”
Screening Criteria:
n US-based practitioners
n Publication history on treatment of Hepatitis C
· High volume treaters of Hepatitis C
Representative Institutions:
n
n
n
n
n
n
n Lenox Hill GI Fellows Clinic, NY
n
n
n
| © Panel Intelligence, LLC. 1999-2008. All rights reserved. A wholly owned subsidiary of MCF Corporation (NASDAQ: MERR) Privacy Policy |